Friday, December 25, 2009


It is very interesting to see how people are zealots in regard to capitalism.  I often wonder if they have a clue just what capitalism is?  Apparently they got all their information from a bunch of slime ball economists.

Capitalism is conflated with free enterprise, which I fully endorse, but is in reality monopoly capitalism.

The platitude espoused is that capitalism thrives on healthy competition.  Excuse me?  Corporations HATE competition.  Competition hurts the bottom line.

There were well over a dozen car manufacturers in America before the Second World War.  Under monopoly capitalism that number was reduced to the Big Three, the companies that kissed the government's ass the most.  That's not healthy competition. That's the consolidation of manufacturing into just a few hands, fueled by government payouts and subsidies. 

Free enterprise is the economic philosophy you should be espousing, not monopoly capitalism.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009


You've heard of an "atavistic resurgence." As if. That's both barrels loaded with duds in the middle of a war.

At this point, we need an Atavistic Insurgency, not a mere flurry of folk music and fond memories. You don't sit down and reminisce in the midst of a full-blown plague that stands to wipe out your kith and kin. You find the carriers of the disease, quarantine them, and if they cannot be cured, fire surely will cure them and save the rest of us. As for the disease, since it is a disease of weak minds and weak bodies, carriers stupid enough to buy the alien garbage are the targets.

In Switzerland they recently had a row over banning minarets from Muslim mosques. That's like going after the vomit from a stomach virus, rather than purging the virus itself with medicine. How about deporting the Muslims from Switzerland and giving them a first-class ticket back to Medina or Mecca? Don't fuck around with bullshit. Go after the root cause.

As with anything, clean up your own lair first.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009


Some would argue that there is a conflict between being a Pan-European and an individualist.  The caricature presented is that if you are a rugged individualist, then YOU MUST be a racial anomie, unattached to any racial ties whatsoever.  If only things were that simple.

Let me educate you.  Whether you like it or not, you are part of a race (I'm excluding octroons, quadroons and the like for efficiency).  Even if these ties are very loose, you either benefit, don't benefit, or are in a static state of affairs.  Now here is where things get very interesting.  Let's say Race B hates your race (Race A) and wants Race A dead, including YOU.  Suddenly you are faced with in-group/out-group conflicts bigger than yourself.  It turns out the world does not revolve around you, and people from Race B don't care about your neutrality (in fact, they see you as even weaker for not realizing  the obvious). 

The multi-racial societies we find ourselves within are not natural.  Races typically dwell apart from one another and have limited interactions.  This is borne out in cognitive neuroscience studies which show that the amygdala goes apeshit when a subject sees the unfamiliar face of a person of another race.  If it were natural for multi-racial societies to exist, then that alarm bell of the brain would not go off.  

Pan-Europeans simply accept the fact that life would be better if we had lands of our own.  The Jews, although they are not a race (they've infiltrated every race and are envious of pure races),understand this organic fact and they stick together for the good of individuals and their group.

As with everything, balance is essential.  You shouldn't write a blank check to someone of your race, they should be judged as an individual.  But you should be smart enough to realize that there exists an in-group/out-group conflict, and this I'm-OK-You're-OK stuff is going to be thrown out the window when the shit jumps off.